August 27th, 2020

F# 5 update for August

Phillip Carter
Program Manager

We’re excited to announce more updates to F# 5 which will go alongside .NET 5 preview 8! We’ve shipped various updates since the beginning of this year:

Today, we’re pleased to announce the completion of the F# 5 feature work. There is one minor enhancement planned for the .NET 5 RC, but other than that we are finished with F# 5! From this point forward, our journey to shipping F# 5 will be focused mostly on bug fixes and addressing feedback.

You can get the latest F# 5 in these ways

If you’re using Visual Studio on Windows, you’ll need both the .NET 5 preview SDK and Visual Studio Preview installed.

Using F# 5 preview

You can use F# 5 preview via the .NET 5 preview SDK, or through the .NET and Jupyter Notebooks support.

If you’re using the .NET 5 preview SDK, check out the sample repository which shows off some of what you can do with F# 5. You can play with each of the features there instead of starting from scratch.

If you’d rather use F# 5 in your own project, you’ll need to add a LangVersion property with preview as the value. It should look something like this:

Alternatively, if you’re using Jupyter Notebooks and want a more interactive experience, check out a sample notebook that shows the same features, but has a more interactive output.

String Interpolation

This preview adds String Interpolation, one of the most highly-requested language features and the very first feature that we had an initial design for in the F# Language Design repository. The design has undergone a lot of discussion over the years, but finally a breakthrough on how to best handle it was made by Yatao Li, who also supplied an initial implementation.

F# interpolated strings are fairly similar to C# or JavaScript interpolated strings, in that they let you write code in "holes" inside of a string literal. Here’s a basic example:

However, F# interpolated strings also allow for typed interpolations, just like the sprintf function, to enforce that an expression inside of an interpolated context conforms to a particular type. It uses the same format specifiers.

Support for nameof is now complete

In the June update, we mentioned that we were finishing up several design changes for nameof. These are now complete!

To recap, nameof resolves the symbol it’s being used for and produces a name that represents what it’s called in F# source. This is useful in various scenarios, such as logging, and protects your logging against changes in source code.

The last line will throw an exception and "month" will be shown in the error message.

You can take a name of nearly everything in F#:

Three final additions are changes to how operators work: the addition of the nameof<'type-parameter> form for generic type parameters, and the ability to use nameof as a pattern in a pattern match expression.

The nameof<'type-parameter> form aligns with how typeof and typedefof work in F# today.

Open Type declarations

This preview also adds Open Type Declarations. It’s like Open Static Classes in C#, except with some different syntax and some slightly different behavior to fit F# semantics.

With Open Type Declarations, you can open any type to expose static contents inside of it. Additionally, you can open F#-defined unions and records to expose their contents. This can be useful if you have a union defined in a module and want to access its cases, but don’t want to open the entire module.

Overloads of custom keywords in computation expressions

Computation expressions are a powerful feature for library and framework authors. They allow you to greatly improve the expressiveness of your components by letting you define well-known members and form a DSL for the domain you’re working in.

We’ve enhanced computation expressions to allow for Applicative forms already. This time, Diego Esmerio and Ryan Riley contributed a design and implementation to allow for overloading custom keywords in computation expressions. This new feature allows code like the following to be written:

Prior to this change, you could write the InputBuilder type as it is, but you couldn’t use it the way it’s used in the previous example. Since overloads, optional parameters, and now System.ParamArray types are allowed, everything just works as you’d expect it to.

Thanks, Diego and Ryan!

Interfaces can be implemented at different generic instantiations

The final feature enabled in this preview is an enhancement to interfaces in F#. You can now implement the same interface at different generic instantiations. Lukas Rieger contributed an initial design and implementation of this feature.

Thanks, Lukas!

Finishing F# 5

Now that we’re feature complete for F# 5, minus a tweak here or there, we’re going to shift our focus:

  • Address bug fixes and high-priority feedback items for F# 5
  • Improve our engineering system in the F# development repository, particularly to improve our testing infrastructure so that it’s easier for open source contributors to work there

After F# 5 ships alongside .NET 5, we’ll also start our planning for the next wave of F# investments. We’d love for you to join us when we get there.

Cheers, and happy F# coding!

Category
.NET

Author

Phillip Carter
Program Manager

Phillip is a PM on the .NET team, focusing on the F# language, F# documentation, F# tooling, and project system tooling. He wishes he had more time to code, but that doesn't stop him from having fun with people on GitHub. He loves functional programming and language-related tooling, and is always available to chat about wild and wacky ways to make programming more enjoyable.

4 comments

Discussion is closed. Login to edit/delete existing comments.

  • Mikael Öhman

    This is so great. F# 5.0 has made this language almost perfect.

    Really excited for NET 5.0.

    Thank you all.

    • Phillip CarterMicrosoft employee Author

      Thanks you! Glad to hear that the F# 5 feature set is aligning well with what you’re after. Looking forward to release this in the fall!

  • Deyan Petrov

    String Interpolation will be awesome (thanks to all involved, I was following also the recent discussions on twitter), but what about anonymous DUs? I saw little hope in the github thread (checked last week) due to some difficulties, but that will really complete my list of F# gaps which I really noticed in the practice!

    • Phillip CarterMicrosoft employee Author

      Hey Deyan,

      Anonymous Unions aren’t planned for F# 5. They may be considered for the next F# language version though, since they are certainly a useful feature. They would be a challenging feature to tackle, though.