Announcing .NET Core 3.1

Rich Lander [MSFT]

Announcing .NET Core 3.1

We’re excited to announce the release of .NET Core 3.1. It’s really just a small set of fixes and refinements over .NET Core 3.0, which we released just over two months ago. The most important feature is that .NET Core 3.1 is an long-term supported (LTS) release and will be supported for three years. As we’ve done in the past, we wanted to take our time before releasing the next LTS release. The extra two months (after .NET Core 3.0) allowed us to select and implement the right set of improvements over what was already a very stable base. .NET Core 3.1 is now ready to be used wherever your imagination or business need takes it.

You can download .NET Core 3.1, for Windows, macOS, and Linux:

ASP.NET Core and EF Core are also being released today.

Visual Studio 2019 16.4 was also released today and includes .NET Core 3.1. It is a required update to use .NET Core 3.1 with Visual Studio. For Visual Studio 2019 users, we recommend simply updating Visual Studio to 16.4 and instead of separately downloading .NET Core 3.1.

Visual Studio for Mac also supports and includes .NET Core 3.1, in the Visual Studio for Mac 8.4 Preview channel. You will need to opt into the Preview channel to use .NET Core 3.1.

Release notes:

The changes in .NET Core 3.1 were primarily focussed on Blazor and Windows Desktop, the two new and large additions in .NET Core 3.0. This includes support for C++/CLI, which has been a regular request for developers targeting Windows.

Before we take a look at what’s new in .NET Core 3.1, let’s take a quick look at the key improvements in .NET Core 3.0, which is the bulk of what’s important to consider for .NET Core 3.1.

Recap of .NET Core 3.0 Improvements

The following key improvements were delivered in .NET Core 3.0. We’ve already heard from developers of big sites that it is working super well for them.

  • .NET Core 3.0 is already battle-tested by being hosted for months at and on Many other Microsoft teams will soon be deploying large workloads on .NET Core 3.1 in production.
  • Performance is greatly improved across many components and is described in detail at Performance Improvements in .NET Core 3.0 and Hardware Intrinsics in .NET Core.
  • C# 8 add async streams, range/index, more patterns, and nullable reference types. Nullable enables you to directly target the flaws in code that lead to NullReferenceException. The lowest layer of the framework libraries has been annotated, so that you know when to expect null.
  • F# 4.7 focuses on making some thing easier with implicit yield expressions and some syntax relaxations. It also includes support for LangVersion, and ships with nameof and opening of static classes in preview. The F# Core Library now also targets .NET Standard 2.0. You can read more at Announcing F# 4.7.
  • .NET Standard 2.1 increases the set of types you can use in code that can be used woth both .NET Core and Xamarin. .NET Standard 2.1 includes types since .NET Core 2.1.
  • Windows Desktop apps are now supported with .NET Core, for both Windows Forms and WPF (and open source). The WPF designer is part of Visual Studio 2019. The Windows Forms designer is in preview and available as a download.
  • .NET Core apps now have executables by default. In past releases, apps needed to be launched via the dotnet command, like dotnet myapp.dll. Apps can now be launched with an app-specific executable, like myapp or ./myapp, depending on the operating system.
  • High performance JSON APIs have been added, for reader/writer, object model and serialization scenarios. These APIs were built from scratch on top of Span<T> and use UTF8 under the covers instead of UTF16 (like string). These APIs minimize allocations, resulting in faster performance, and much less work for the garbage collector. See Try the new System.Text.Json APIs.
  • The garbage collector uses less memory by default, often a lot less. This improvement is very beneficial for scenarios where many applications are hosted on the same server. The garbage collector has also been updated to make better use of large numbers of cores, on machines with >64 cores. See Making CPU configuration better for GC on machines with > 64 CPUs.
  • .NET Core has been hardened for Docker to enable .NET applications to work predictably and efficiently in containers. The garbage collector and thread pool have been updated to work much better when a container has been configured for limited memory or CPU. .NET Core docker images are smaller, particularly the SDK image. See: Running with Server GC in a Small Container Scenario Part 0, Running with Server GC in a Small Container Scenario Part 1 – Hard Limit for the GC Heap and Using .NET and Docker Together – DockerCon 2019 Update.
  • Raspberry Pi and ARM chips are now supported to enable IoT development, including with the remote Visual Studio debugger. You can deploy apps that listen to sensors, and print messages or images on a display, all using the new GPIO APIs. ASP.NET can be used to expose data as an API or as a site that enables configuring an IoT device.

Platform support

.NET Core 3.1 is supported on the following operating systems:

  • Alpine: 3.10+
  • Debian: 9+
  • Ubuntu: 16.04+
  • Fedora: 29+
  • centOS: 7+
  • RHEL: 6+
  • openSUSE: 15+
  • SUSE Enterprise Linux (SLES): 12 SP2+
  • macOS: 10.13+
  • Windows Client: 7, 8.1, 10 (1607+)
  • Windows Server: 2012 R2+

Note: Windows Forms and WPF apps are only functional and supported on Windows.

Chip support follows:

  • x64 on Windows, macOS, and Linux
  • x86 on Windows
  • ARM32 on Windows and Linux
  • ARM64 on Linux (kernel 4.14+)

Note: Please ensure that .NET Core 3.1 ARM64 deployments use Linux kernel 4.14 version or later. For example, Ubuntu 18.04 satisfies this requirement, but 16.04 does not.

Windows Forms Controls Removal

The following Windows Forms controls have been removed from .NET Core 3.1:

  • DataGrid
  • ToolBar
  • ContextMenu
  • Menu
  • MainMenu
  • MenuItem

These controls were replaced with more powerful controls in .NET Framework 2.0, back in 2005. They have not been available by default in the Visual Studio Designer Toolbox for many years. As a result, we decided to remove these controls and focus only on the new ones.

The following replacements are recommended:

Old Control (API) Recommended Replacement Other associated APIs removed
DataGrid DataGridView DataGridCell, DataGridRow, DataGridTableCollection, DataGridColumnCollection, DataGridTableStyle, DataGridColumnStyle, DataGridLineStyle, DataGridParentRowsLabel, DataGridParentRowsLabelStyle, DataGridBoolColumn, DataGridTextBox, GridColumnStylesCollection, GridTableStylesCollection, HitTestType
ToolBar ToolStrip ToolBarAppearance
ToolBarButton ToolStripButton ToolBarButtonClickEventArgs, ToolBarButtonClickEventHandler, ToolBarButtonStyle, ToolBarTextAlign
ContextMenu ContextMenuStrip
Menu ToolStripDropDown, ToolstripDropDownMenu MenuItemCollection
MainMenu MenuStrip
MenuItem ToolstripMenuItem

Yes, this is an unfortunate breaking change. You will see build breaks if you are using the controls we removed in your applications. Also, if you open .NET Core 3.0 applications in the latest versions of the .NET Core Windows Forms designer, you will see errors if you are using these controls.

We recommend you update your applications to .NET Core 3.1 and move to the alternative controls. Replacing the controls is a straight-forward process, essentially “find and replace”.

First, we should have made these changes before we released .NET Core 3.0, and we appologize for that. We try to avoid late changes, and even more for breaking changes, and it pains us to make this one.

As we got further into the Windows Forms designer project, we realized that these controls were not aligned with creating modern applications and should never have been part of the .NET Core port of Windows Forms. We also saw that they would require more time from us to support than made sense.

Our goal is to continue to improve Windows Forms for high DPI, accessibility, and reliability, and this late change was required to enable us to focus on delivering that.


We added support for creating C++/CLI (AKA “managed C++”) components that can be used with .NET Core 3.0+, in Visual Studio 2019 16.4. You need to install the “Desktop development with C++” workload and the “C++/CLI support” component in order to use C++/CLI.

This component adds a couple templates that you can use:

  • CLR Class Library (.NET Core)
  • CLR Empty Project (.NET Core)

If you cannot find them, just search for them in the New Project dialog.

C++/CLI is only enabled on Windows. You cannot use C++/CLI components targeted for .NET Framework with .NET Core or vice versa.


We recommend moving to .NET Core 3.1 as soon as you can. It is a great release (largely due to 3.0) that brings improvements to so many aspects of .NET Core. It is also a long term support (LTS) release, and will be supported for three years.

Life cycle update:

  • .NET Core 3.0 will reach end-of-life three months from today, on March 3, 2020.
  • .NET Core 2.2 will each end of life on December 23rd.
  • .NET Core 2.1 will be supported until August 2021 (it is also an LTS release).

The following .NET Core posts are recommended reading to learn more about what you get with .NET Core 3.1 and other projects we’ve been working on.






Discussion is closed. Login to edit/delete existing comments.

    • Richard LanderMicrosoft employee 0

      Great question. The team is working on that. It is a website logic bug. The latest release hasn’t been LTS in a while, so this specific situation wasn’t coded for. Much of the site is data-driven off of this file: So, it’s not an issue of some static text not being updated. I expect issue to get resolved later today.

      • Steven Yeh 0

        This has been resolved

      • Alexey Leonovich 0

        Also for .NET Core 2.1 column End of support is empty (should be August 2021).

        • Richard LanderMicrosoft employee 0

          I reported that. I hope they fix that today. Thanks for reporting it, too.

    • Wil Wilder Apaza Bustamante 0

      this comment has been deleted.

  • Max Mustermueller 0

    The added messagebox if .NET Core runtime is missing on non self-containd applications is my personal highlight of the .NET Core 3.1 release. I’ve been waiting for this since .NET Core 3.0 before I ship out my ported applications. Thank you so much for adding this!

    • Olia GavryshMicrosoft employee 0


    • Richard LanderMicrosoft employee 0

      Ah, I totally forgot about that. Yes, that’s a big win. I’ll post about that sometime later as its own separate topic. We still have a bit of back-end work to do on that to make it fully correct.

      You can checkout out the design work on that if you’d like:

  • Daniel Steiner 0

    the official download page for .NET Core 3.1 Dec 3 delivers the preview3 version and not the RTM.

    download the Windows 64-bit runtime and check the program version in the file property

    • Richard LanderMicrosoft employee 0

      That would be concerning! Can you give me a specific file to test? I cannot repro this with the MSI or zip on Windows.

      • Daniel Steiner 0

        I guess it was a CDN caching issue.

        Yesterday the version for dotnet-runtime-3.1.0-win-x64.exe was

        Today the correct version is delivered.

      • Steven Chapman 0

        I’m having a very similar issue. When I install dotnet-hosting-3.1.0-win.exe, It installs the 3.1.0 Preview 3 runtime, not the RTM.

        • Wil Wilder Apaza Bustamante 0

          this comment has been deleted.

        • Anders Gregersen 0

          Same here – thankfully discovered before rolling out to all IIS servers in our business

      • Mat B 0

        It is still the case for me. The hosting bundle installs the 3.1.0 Preview 3.

    • Taylor Buchanan 0

      This hosting bundle issue appears to be only cosmetic:

      The installer and programs list show “Preview 3” but it is actually the RTM branded incorrectly.

      As an unnecessary workaround, you can install the runtime separately and excluding the runtime install from the hosting bundle using the OPT_NO_RUNTIME argument:

      dotnet-hosting-3.1.0-win.exe OPT_NO_RUNTIME=1

  • Marcel 0

    When will .NET Core 3.0 be able to run on Azure?
    It’s been 2+ months since the “release” in September and we still can’t deploy our .NET Core 3.0 code to Azure.

    Can somebody please light a fire under this?

    • Bin Dong 0

      I think someone just commented, it will be deployed soon.

      • Richard LanderMicrosoft employee 0

        The 3.0 and 3.1 runtimes are now available in most regions. The SDK is not and is still coming. I don’t have a date on that. If you rely on Kudu deployment, then you need the SDK. If you use Azure DevOps or other approaches to deploy your application, then you only need the runtime and are good-to-go now.

        • Darren Ford 0

          My app service was apparently updated with core 3.1 and now I am running into a CORS error this is a bit odd. To confirm, I test locally with core 3.0 one last time before updating to latest VS 2019 that installs 3.1. After updating locally, I now get the error locally. The error is:

          Endpoint [Redacted] contains CORS metadata, but a middleware was not found that supports CORS.
          Configure your application startup by adding app.UseCors() inside the call to Configure(..) in the application startup code. The call to app.UseAuthorization() must appear between app.UseRouting() and app.UseEndpoints(…)

          Everything was working but now this. Anyone come across this yet?

          • Darren Ford 0

            For anyone who runs across this. I moved app.UseCors AFTER app.UseRouting and the issue in .net core 3.1 went away. Something changed related to this in 3.1.

  • Dave Bacher 0

    I know a lot of times I’m negative – but all these changes are welcome. However:
    .NET Core apps now have executables by default. In past releases, apps needed to be launched via the dotnet command, like dotnet myapp.dll. Apps can now be launched with an app-specific executable, like myapp or ./myapp, depending on the operating system.

    ^ This is fantastic. Mind you, I’m in favor of all the other changes this time around (that’s not always the case), but this one specifically is huge.

    • Richard LanderMicrosoft employee 0

      Ya, that is a great feature — the executables. I’m super happy we have that now.

  • Les Thomas (TheDestinyGroup) 0


    I just installed the .Net Core 3.1 Hosting bundle and at one point during the installation I noticed it said it something like installing .Net Core 3.1.0 Preview 3.

    After the installation completed I went to Add/Remove programs and noticed that it had installed “Microsoft .Net Core 3.1.0 – Windows Server Hosting” along with “Microsoft .Net Core Runtime – 3.1.0 Preview 3 (x64)” and “Microsoft .Net Core Runtime – 3.1.0 Preview 3 (x86)”.

    Why is the .Net Core 3.1 Hosting bundle installing the .Net Core 3.1 runtimes which are labelled as “3.1.0 Preview 3” rather than the expected “3.1.0”?

    Even if the Runtime didn’t change between Preview 3 release and general availability release both the name shown in the installers UI and name shown in Add/Remove programs should have been updated to reflect the products correct naming for the general availability release as corporate customers don’t expect to see products labelled with alpha, beta or release preview naming installed on their production servers.


    PS: It appears the downloads for the x86 and x64 .Net 3 Core Runtimes are also named in the installers UI and in Add/Remove programs as .Net Core 3.1 Preview 3.

      • Wil Wilder Apaza Bustamante 0

        this comment has been deleted.

  • Kamran Shahid 0

    Is there any package for aspnetcore-runtime-3.1 and dotnet-runtime-3.1 available yet
    I am trying to install the 3.1 package but not able to find it

    Also i have also seen that dotnet runtime 3.1 windows (x64) installer still have label of preview 3 in installation.

  • Jens Hofmann 0

    Hey Richard,

    I search the last couple of month is someone has the same problems like us but I dit not find anything so I try asking here.
    We do have a self-contained .net core 3 app called fastunpack/fastpack.

    This app suddenly does no longer work and quits starting with the following error:

    An assembly specified in the application dependencies manifest (FastUnpack.deps.json) was not found:
    package: '', version: '3.0.0'
    path: 'System.Collections.Specialized.dll'

    Deleting the cache folder and starting the app again fixes this error.
    As we can track it down, this problem starts arising when a windows update happened.

    Are we the only ones having that problem?
    This problem is very frustrating for us because the tool is a tool used for build- and testautomation which currenty suddenly breaks.


    • Richard LanderMicrosoft employee 0

      Send me mail @ rlander@ms and we’ll get you sorted. Sorry to hear about that!

    • Barbara Bonilla 0

      Hello, Jens and Richard!

      Question on this – Was this resolved and how? I’m facing this same issue right now.
      Would appreciate any guidance or tips on how to get this sort out!

      Thanks & have a lovely day!

  • Elon Mallin 0

    Is .NET Core supported in Azure DevOps by default now? The last post about the release of .NET Core 3.0 said something about it not being ready yet?

      • Stevie White 0

        It works but the Microsoft Hosted Windows Agents appear to not be up to date with the latest version of VS. If I try to do a release build with 3.1 and the desktop bridge, the build always fails with this error, which looks like the kind I see if publishing profiles are wrong:

        C:\hostedtoolcache\windows\dotnet\sdk\3.1.100\Sdks\Microsoft.NET.Sdk\targets\Microsoft.PackageDependencyResolution.targets(234,5): Error NETSDK1005: Assets file ‘d:\a\1\s\Application\YourProject\obj\project.assets.json’ doesn’t have a target for ‘.NETCoreApp,Version=v3.0’. Ensure that restore has run and that you have included ‘netcoreapp3.0’ in the TargetFrameworks for your project.
        Process ‘msbuild.exe’ exited with code ‘1’.

        Unless someone here has a work around to get it to work in Azure Devops, I’ll probably have to use my own work around for now. 🙁

        • Richard LanderMicrosoft employee 0

          Understood. This is less about .NET Core 3.1 and more about Visual Studio 2019 16.4. You’ll have to wait until 16.4 is made available. I don’t know what the pattern is for deploying new VS versions in DevOps.

  • Jukka 0

    We’re eager to switch to .NET Core 3.0, but alas, OData only supports 2.2 so far.

    • Daniel Kress 0

      Finally nice. But still eagerly waiting vor OData Support (incl. VersionedODataModelBuilder and swagger in combination) as well.

      • Ai Haibara 0

        Need this too.

Feedback usabilla icon