Microsoft Open-Sources GW-BASIC

Rich Turner

We are excited to announce the open-sourcing of Microsoft GW-BASIC on GitHub!

Yes, seriously 😀


Since re-open-sourcing MS-DOS 1.25 & 2.0 on GitHub last year, we’ve received numerous requests to also open-source Microsoft BASIC.

Well, here we are! 😁

The Source

These sources, as clearly stated in the repo’s readme, are the 8088 assembly language sources from 10th Feb 1983, and are being open-sourced for historical reference and educational purposes. This means we will not be accepting PRs that modify the source in any way.

A little historical context

The GW-BASIC source code being published is dated Feb 10th 1983. That was quite a while ago, so just to set a little historical perspective:

The week this source was created Men At Work topped the US and UK singles charts with “Down Under”, Dustin Hoffman starred in the #1 US box-office movie, “Tootsie”. In 1983, “Star Wars Episode VI – Return of the Jedi” was released, as was “War Games”! And, Emily Blunt, Kate Mara, Jonah Hill, Chris Hemsworth, and Henry Cavill, were born! Ronald Reagan was President of the USA, and Margaret Thatcher was the UK’s Prime Minister.

That same year, Bjarne Stroustrup was in the middle of developing the first version of the C++ programming language, ARPANET standardized TCP/IP. Borland announced Turbo Pascal, created by Anders Hejlsberg (who went on to join Microsoft, and create J++, C# and TypeScript).

1983 was also the year AT&T released UNIX System V R1, and BSD 4.2 was released, introducing the pseudoterminal for the first time (the progenitor to Windows’ ConPTY we introduced to Windows in 2018 😁)

I was 13, and spent every spare second that I wasn’t finishing my homework or doing my chores, writing BASIC and assembly code on one of the hottest home computers of the time – the BBC Micro sporting 32KB RAM (yes, 32,768 bytes, total!), powered by a 6502 processor running at a BLAZING 2MHz. When not coding, I was usually playing one of the most groundbreaking games of all time: “Elite” by David Braben & Ian Bell.

In 1983, Apple launched the 1MHz 6502-powered Apple IIe for US$1,395 (> $3,500 in 2020). Apple also launched the first retail-available computer with a GUI – the Apple Lisa. The Lisa contained a staggering 1MB RAM, and ran the awesome Motorola 68000 processor at an astounding 5MHz, but it cost $9,995 (> $25,000 in 2020 dollars), so all I could do was peer at it through the window of the one computer store in our town authorized to sell Apple’s products … and dream.

And, in 1983 Microsoft released MS-DOS 2.0 (source here), and GW-BASIC for the IBM PC XT and compatibles.


GW-BASIC was a BASIC interpreter derived from IBM’s Advanced BASIC/BASICA, which itself was a port of Microsoft BASIC.

Microsoft’s various BASIC implementations can trace their origins all the way back to Bill Gates & Paul Allen’s implementation of Microsoft’s first product – a BASIC interpreter for the Altair 8800.

During the late ’70s and 80s, Microsoft’s BASIC was ported to many OEM’s specific platform and hardware needs, and for several processors popular at that time, including the 8088, 6502, 6809, Z80, and others.


Wait – where’s the C source code?

There is no C source code!

Like much software from the 70s and 80s, and just like the source for MS-DOS, the source code of GW-BASIC is 100% assembly language.

Why assembly? Why didn’t developers use higher-level languages like C, or Pascal?

When developing on/for mainframes and minicomputers of the day, developers were sometimes able to use higher-level languages like FORTRAN, LISP, COBOL, RPG, CPL/BCPL, C, etc. but the compilers for such languages were often hugely expensive, rarely generated efficient code, and were generally unavailable for the space and performance constrained home and personal computers of the day.

When writing software for early PCs, every single byte and every single instruction mattered, so developers often wrote code entirely in assembly language simply to be able to physically fit their software into the available memory, and to be able to access the computer’s resources and internal workings.

Thus, all the source code for GW-BASIC is pure assembly code, translated on a per-processor/per-machine basis from core/master sources.

This source was ‘translated’?

Each of the assembly source files contains a header stating This translation created 10-Feb-83 by Version 4.3

Since the Instruction Set Architecture (ISA) of the early processors used in home and personal computers weren’t spectacularly different from one another, Microsoft was able to generate a substantial amount of the code for a port from the sources of a master implementation. (Alas, sorry, we’re unable to open-source the ISA translator.)

What about other ports?

Many have asked if we can also open-source implementations for processors other than the 808x. Alas, we’re unable to provide sources for these ports and/or customizations.


We hope you enjoy exploring this fascinating snapshot of what software development looked like during the glorious, exciting, heady days of the ’70s and early ’80s at the dawn of “the personal computer” 😁

Many thanks to Amy, Julia Liuson, Amanda Silver, and our awesome CELA team for their approval and help finding, reviewing, and open-sourcing GW-BASIC.


Comments are closed. Login to edit/delete your existing comments

  • Shafiul Islam 0

    This is really great! Thanks Rich!

    • amir Ahmadi 0

      Good write-up. I definitely appreciate this
      site. Keep it up!

  • Mariano Hidalgo 0

    Magnificent article Rich. Thank you!

  • Bell Tavarex 0

    Muito bom gostei
    Atenciosamente Equipe de Marketing Digital

  • Pedro Prado 0

    I was already happy to read you talking how we simply had to use ASM to do useful things, but you got me totally when you mentioned Elite. I played it a lot on the MSX (popular in Brazil).

    Nice article, Commander Jameson!

    • Rich TurnerMicrosoft employee 0

      Many thanks Pedro 🙂 Look forward to seeing you on Lave 😀

  • BERDAH Paul Emile 0

    15 years ago, I start studying what does it take to run basic syntax on any computer.
    I discovered that most of the microprocessors comes with C++ support.
    As Basica is a function call language, I try to write C++ Basic function counterpart of most used ones and it works.
    Deciding for good behaviors, like one line one command, defining variables at the beginning of piece of code etc …
    It begin clear what designing a code editor that translate line by line, in the background, Basic syntax into C++ syntax was the solution.
    The result, a code editor that translate Basic syntax to C++ while doing some grooming and a C++ library of Basic functions equivalent.
    At that point is just the matter to choose the right compiler for the target machine and that’s all.
    Using that process, I write Basica to Javascript transcompiler, to test piece of code interactively, treating files as localstorage.

  • Dave Mackey 0

    Been great to see Microsoft embracing open source so fully over the past number of years.

    Like many, I’d love to see QuickBasic/PDS/VBDOS source code released, understand limitations of third party code.

    Might be interesting to release just Microsoft code portions. The community might be able to figure out how to build the third-party components via reverse engineering. For example, with DOS, I imagine a lot of the utilities already exist through OSS like FreeDOS and DOSBox.

    If source code can’t be released for these, is there a possibility of releasing the software under a free license? Copies of all are readily available floating around the internet, and Microsoft doesn’t seem interested in prosecuting these hosts of “abandonware” – but would be nice to see an official, legal release from Microsoft. 🙂

Feedback usabilla icon