[Updated: 21Nov07 to clarify that custom headers are supported, but not in NetCFSvcUtil proxy generation]
[Updated: 27Aug07 to correct Gzip sample, and clarify on transports & extensibility]
[Updated: 23Aug07 to add SecurityAlgorithmSuite enumerable]
Many people have been asking about what subset of .NET 3.0’s Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) will be supported by the .NET Compact Framework 3.5. Well, here is a table I put together with the answer to that question:
Feature |
Desktop WCF |
Compact WCF |
Bindings: | ||
· BasicHttpBinding | Yes | Yes |
· CustomBinding | Yes | Yes |
· WindowsMobileMailBinding | N/A | Yes |
· ExchangeWebServiceMailBinding | Yes, via NetCF install | Yes |
Formatters: | ||
· SoapFormatter | Yes | Yes |
· BinaryFormatter | Yes | No |
Encoders: | ||
· TextMessageEncoder | Yes | Yes |
· BinaryMessageEncodingBindingElement | Yes | No |
· MTOMEncoder | Yes | No |
· GzipEncoder | Sample available | Sample available |
Transports: | ||
· HttpTransportBindingElement | Yes | Yes |
· HttpsTransportBindingElement | Yes | Yes |
· MailTransportBindingElement | Yes, via NetCF install | Yes |
· MsmqTransportBindingElement | Yes | No |
· TcpTransportBindingElement | Yes | No |
· (other transports) | Yes | No |
XmlDictionaryReader/Writer | Yes | Yes; stub around XmlTextReader/Writer |
DataContractSerializer | Yes | No; but can be wire-compatible with DCS via XmlSerializer |
Service proxy generation | Yes; via SvcUtil.exe | Yes; via NetCFSvcUtil.exe, not integrated into VS2008 |
· Non-HTTP transports in generated proxies | Yes | Not built-in |
· Custom headers in generated proxies | Yes | Not built-in |
WS-Addressing | Yes | Yes |
WS-Security message level security | ||
· X.509 | Yes | Yes |
· Username/password | Yes | No |
· SecurityAlgorithmSuite.Basic256Rsa15 | Yes | Yes |
· SecurityAlgorithmSuite.Basic256 | Yes | No |
WS-ReliableMessaging | Yes | No |
Patterns | ||
· Service model | Yes | No |
· Message layer programming | Yes | Yes |
· Buffered messages | Yes | Yes |
· Streaming messages | Yes | No |
· Endpoint descriptions in .config files | Yes | No |
Channel extensibility | Yes | Yes |
Security channel extensibility | Yes | No |
0 comments