Windows Runtime objects are represented by their default interface, so choose your default interface wisely

Raymond Chen

As I noted some time ago, in the Windows Runtime, objects are represented at the ABI by a pointer to their default interface. The choice of default interface is usually obvious, but on occasion, the non-obvious choice may be better.

If your runtime object supports only one interface, then you have no choice but to make that interface the default interface. But if your runtime object supports multiple interfaces, then you have a choice. For example:

runtimeclass AudioTrack : IMediaTrack
{
    event Windows.Foundation.TypedEventHandler<AudioTrack, AudioTrackOpenedEventArgs>
        OpenFailed;

    AudioEncodingProperties GetEncodingProperties();
    MediaPlaybackItem PlaybackItem { get; };
    String Name { get; };
    AudioTrackSupportInfo SupportInfo { get; };
};

As written, the MIDL compiler does the following:

  • Autogenerates an interface called IAudioTrack to contain the members declared in the class definition.
  • Defines the AudioTrack class as implementing the IAudioTrack and IMediaTrack interfaces.
  • Marks the IAudioTrack class as the default interface.

As noted above, the default interface is used to represent the object. Method calls on the default interface will be faster than method calls on non-default interfaces, because methods on non-default interfaces require a Query­Interface to obtain the interface. Therefore, you should choose your default interface to be one that holds the methods that you anticipate will be used the most. If that interface is not the autogenerated interface, you can specify a custom default interface by putting the word [default] in front of the interface you want to be the default interface:

runtimeclass AudioTrack : [default] IMediaTrack
{
    event Windows.Foundation.TypedEventHandler<AudioTrack, AudioTrackOpenedEventArgs>
        OpenFailed;

    AudioEncodingProperties GetEncodingProperties();
    MediaPlaybackItem PlaybackItem { get; };
    String Name { get; };
    AudioTrackSupportInfo SupportInfo { get; };
};

In this case, the object will be used primarily as a media track, and it is the methods on IMediaTrack that will get the most exercise. Registering for the OpenFailed event will probably happen only once, and the support info might never be used at all. It would be preferable to make the IMediaTrack the default interface, so that the commonly-used methods are readily available.

Another scenario where you may want to override the MIDL compiler’s choice of default interface is if your class implements a collection, possibly with an extra method or two. The object will almost certainly be used as a collection, so you should choose the collection as your default interface:

runtimeclass PlayerCollection : [default] IVector<Page>,
{
  void MoveToIndex(Player player, Int32 newIndex);
}

This hypothetical Player­Collection class implements IVector, so you can do all the normal vector things with it. But IVector doesn’t support reordering items. That’s why the Play­Collection has a bonus Move­To­Index method that lets you take an item in the collection and move it to another position. The class may offer this so that it can provide a more suitable animation: You could get the same effect by removing the player and then reinserting it at the desired new index. However, that would result in a delete animation followed by an insertion animation, rather than a reordering animation.

4 comments

Discussion is closed. Login to edit/delete existing comments.

  • skSdnW 0

    Are you allowed to change the default down the road if the interface is still compatible?

    In classic COM, ISomething2 would generally implement the same methods as ISomething with new methods at the end and ISomething and ISomething2 would share the same vtable. The caller would not know nor care that the ISomething they asked for is actually a ISomething2.

    • Em X 0

      COM is underneath all this, and COM is still COM, so all of the same ABI rules apply.

      • Kalle Niemitalo 0

        According to Introduction to Microsoft Interface Definition Language 3.0, “Every interface type directly derives from the Windows Runtime IInspectable interface.” This makes it unlikely that ISomething and ISomething2 could share a vtable if they are Windows Runtime interfaces.

  • Kalle Niemitalo 0

    Does the “fast ABI” change the relative costs of the alternatives?

Feedback usabilla icon