Reinterpreting the bits of a 64-bit integer as if they were a double-precision floating point number (and vice versa)

Raymond Chen

Today’s Little Program takes a 64-bit integer and reinterprets its physical representation as a double-precision floating point number.

using System;

class Program
{
 static double ReinterpretAsDouble(long longValue)
 {
  return BitConverter.ToDouble(BitConverter.GetBytes(longValue), 0);
 }

 static long ReinterpretAsLong(double doubleValue)
 {
  return BitConverter.ToInt64(BitConverter.GetBytes(doubleValue), 0);
 }

 static void Main()
 {
  Console.WriteLine(ReinterpretAsDouble(0x4000000000000000));
  Console.WriteLine("{0:X}", ReinterpretAsLong(2.0));
 }
}

Our first attempt uses the Bit­Converter class to convert the 64-bit integer to an array of bytes, and then parses a double-precision floating point number from that byte array.

Maybe you’re not happy that this creates a short-lived byte[] array that will need to be GC’d. So here’s another version that is a little sneakier.

using System;
using System.Runtime.InteropServices;

class Program
{
 [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Explicit)]
 struct LongAndDouble
 {
  [FieldOffset(0)] public long longValue;
  [FieldOffset(0)] public double doubleValue;
 }

 static double ReinterpretAsDouble(long longValue)
 {
  LongAndDouble both;
  both.doubleValue = 0.0;
  both.longValue = longValue;
  return both.doubleValue;
 }

 static long ReinterpretAsLong(double doubleValue)
 {
  LongAndDouble both;
  both.longValue = 0;
  both.doubleValue = doubleValue;
  return both.longValue;
 }
 ...
}

This version creates a structure with an unusual layout: The two members occupy the same physical storage. The conversion is done by storing the 64-bit integer into that storage location, then reading the double-precision floating point value out.

There’s a third method that involves writing the 64-bit integer to a memory stream via Binary­Writer then reading it back with Binary­Reader, but this is clearly inferior to the Bit­Converter so I didn’t bother writing it up.

Update: Damien points out that this functionality already exists in the BCL: Bit­Converter.Double­To­Int64­Bits and Bit­Converter.Int64­Bits­To­Double. But there doesn’t appear to be a Bit­Converter.Float­To­Int32­Bits method, so the techniques discussed above are not completely useless.

Exercise: Why did I have to initialize the doubleValue before writing to longValue, and vice versa? What are the implications of the answer to the above question? (Yes, I could have written LongAndDouble both = new LongAndDouble();, which automatically zero-initializes everything, but then I wouldn’t have had an interesting exercise!)

0 comments

Discussion is closed.

Feedback usabilla icon