Using Command Binding in Windows Forms apps to go Cross-Platform

Klaus Loeffelmann

Large line-of-business WinForms applications can often benefit from the use of the Model-View-ViewModel (MVVM) pattern to simplify maintenance, reuse, and unit testing. In this post, I’ll explain the important concepts and architectural patterns of MVVM including data binding and command binding. Then we will take a look at how you can leverage modern libraries, .NET 7 features, and Visual Studio tooling to efficiently modernize your WinForms applications. By the end, you will see how this approach sets your application up to go cross-platform with popular frameworks like .NET MAUI which can leverage the MVVM code across iOS, Android, Mac, and Windows.

Say Goodbye to Code-behind: WinForms meets MVVM & .NET MAUI

One of the features that has led WinForms to its overwhelming popularity as a RAD (rapid application development) tool is often, for large line-of-business apps, also its biggest architectural challenge: placing application logic as code behind UI-Element’s event handlers. As an example: The developer wants to display a database view after a mouse click on a pulldown menu entry. The pulldown menu is located in the main form of the application. This form is a class derived from System.Windows.Forms, so it has dependencies to the .NET WinForms runtime. This means every line of code put here can only be reused in a context of a, probably even only if the context of exactly this WinForms app. Typically for WinForms, user interaction with any UI elements triggers events. These events are then handled in corresponding event handler routines, and this approach is often called code-behind. So, the code behind the menu entry is triggered. In many cases, the form is now executing the logic for a domain-specific task that basically has nothing to do with the UI. For large line-of-business apps, this can quickly become an architectural nightmare.

In the case of this example, the code which is executed as a result of a user clicking a menu item contains many steps. The form connects to a database, sends a query to that database, then feeds the data, perhaps prepares it by performing additional calculations or pulling in additional data from other sources, and finally passes the resulting data set to another WinForms form which it then presents in a DataGridView. Code-behind application architectures in this way tend to easily mix domain-specific with UI-technical tasks. The resulting codebase is not only difficult to maintain, it is also hard to reuse in other scenarios, let alone easily support unit testing of the business logic.

Enter UI-Controller architecture

With the introduction of Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) in 2008, a new design pattern emerged that set out to clean up the code-behind spaghetti architecture of previous UI stacks and introduced a clear separation of code based on the layer in the application: UI-relevant code remained alone in a view layer, domain-specific code migrated to a ViewModel layer, and additional data transport classes, which were used to transport data from a database or an alike data source and were processed in the view model, were simply called Model classes.

The name of the pattern became Model-View-ViewModel, or MVVM for short. The processing of data and the execution of the domain-specific code are reserved for the ViewModel. As an example, the business logic for an accounting application only runs in the context of one (or more) ViewModel assemblies. Projects that build these assemblies have no references to concrete UI stacks like WinForms, WPF or .NET MAUI. Rather, they provide an invisible or virtual UI only through properties, which are then linked to the UI at runtime via data binding.

This technique is not entirely new for WinForms apps. Abstraction via data binding was already common practice in the VB6 days and became even more flexible with WinForms and the introduction of Typed DataSets. The abstraction of data and UI worked according to the same principle then as it does today: The various properties of a data source (in MVVM the ViewModel, in typical WinForms or VB6 architectures often a filtered and specially prepared view of the database directly) are bound to specific control elements of the UI. The Firstname property of a data source class is bound to the Text property of the FirstnameTextBox control. The JoinDate property of the same data source class is bound to the Value property of the JoinDateTimePicker control, and so on. Even the notifications of the data classes to the UI that data has changed worked in the first WinForms versions in the same way as is still the case today in WPF, WinUI or .NET MAUI: data classes implement an interface called INotifyPropertyChanged. This mandates an event called PropertyChanged for the data source classes. It is then the task of the data classes to determine in the respective setters of the property implementations whether the property value had really changed and, if this is the case, to trigger the corresponding event, specifying the property name. A typical implementation of a property in a class looks something like this:

    public class NotifyPropertyChangeDemo : INotifyPropertyChanged
        // The event that is fired when a property changes.
        public event PropertyChangedEventHandler? PropertyChanged;

        // Backing field for the property.
        private string? _lastName;
        private string? _firstName;

        // The property that is being monitored.
        public string? LastName
            get => _lastName;

                if (_lastName == value)

                _lastName = value;

                // Notify the UI that the property has changed.
                // Using CallerMemberName at the call site will automatically fill in
                // the name of the property that changed.

        public string? FirstName
            get => _firstName;

                if (_firstName == value)

                _firstName = value;

        private void OnPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = "") 
            => PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));

In summary, the general idea is to remote-control the actual UI through data binding. However, in contrast to the original thought coming from VB6 and the classical WinForms data binding, using a UI-Controller pattern like MVVM is more than a convenience to populate a complex form with data: While VB6 and classic WinForms applications typically only used populated data classes like Typed DataSets or Entity Framework model class instances, the ViewModel holds the data and encapsulates the business logic to prepare that data logically in such a way that practically the only task of the UI layer is to present the data in a user-friendly way.

UI-Controller Architecture in WinForms: To what end?

If you wanted to architect and develop a new application from scratch, you would most likely consider using a modern UI stack for your new development endeavors, and in many cases, that makes sense. If you were to start developing a new Windows app from scratch, a more modern stack like WinUI might be a meaningful alternative. Alternatively, a web-based front end and adapting technologies like Blazor or Angular/TypeScript also have merit. But it’s often not that easy in real life. Here is a list of points to consider, why adapting a UI-Controller architecture for new or existing WinForms apps makes sense:

  • Acceptance of UI paradigm changes in LOB apps: Users usually are trained not only in one particular business application, but also build muscle memory in how the UI is handled across an LOB app-suite in general. If LOB apps get rewritten for a new UI Stack, additional training for the users needs to be taken into account. Modernizing the core of a WinForms business app without changing the workflow for a big existing user base might be a requirement in certain scenarios.

  • Feasibility of re-writes of huge line-of-business apps: There are hundreds of thousands of line-of-business WinForms apps already out there. Simply discarding a huge, often several hundred-thousand lines of code business app is simply not feasible. It makes more sense to re-architect and modernize such an app step by step. The vast majority of development teams simply don’t have the time to keep supporting the actively in-use legacy app while developing the same app – modernized, based on a completely new technology – from scratch. Modernizing the app in place, step-by-step, and area by area is often the only viable alternative.

  • Unit tests for ViewModels: Introducing a UI-controller architecture into an existing LOB app opens up another advantage: Since UI-Controllers/ViewModels are not supposed to have dependencies to certain UI technologies, unit tests for such apps can be implemented much more easily. We cover this topic in more detail in the context of the sample app below.

  • Mobile Apps spin-offs: The necessity for spin-offs of mobile apps from a large WinForms line-of-business apps is a growing requirement for many businesses. With an architecture in which ViewModels can be shared and combined between for example WinForms and .NET MAUI, the development of such mobile apps can be streamlined with a lot of synergy effects. This topic is also covered in more detail in the context of the sample app.

  • Consolidating and modernizing backend technologies: Last but not at all least – with a proper architecture – consolidating onsite server-backends and migrating the backends of a LOB apps to Azure based cloud technologies is straight forward, and can be done as a migration project over time. The users do not lose their usual way of working and the modernization can happen mostly in the background without interruptions.

The sample apps of this blog post

You can find the sample app used in this blog post in the WinForms-Designer-Extensibility Github repo. It contains these areas:

  • The simplified scenarios used in this blog post to explain the UI-Controller/MVVM approach in WinForms with the new WinForms Command Binding features. You find this samples in the project MauiEdit.ViewModel in the solution folder Examples.
  • A bigger example (the WinForms Editor), showing the new WinForms features in the context of a real-world scenario.
  • A .NET MAUI-Project, adapting the exact same ViewModel used for the WinForms App for a .NET MAUI app. We are limiting the showcase here to Android for simplicity in this context.
  • A unit test project, which shows how using ViewModels enables you to write unit tests for a UI based on an UI-Controller abstraction like MVVM.

    Screenshot of the sample app in the solution explorer showing the 4 projects .NET MAUI, WinForms, UnitTest and ViewModel.

NOTE: This blog post is not an introduction to .NET MAUI. There are a lot of resources on the web, showing the basic approach of MVVM with XAML-based UI stacks, an Introduction to .NET MAUI, many examples, and lots of really good YouTube videos.

Animated gif which shows the WinForms and the Android version of the sample editor in action.

Command Binding for calling methods inside the UI-controller

While WinForms brought a pretty complete infrastructure for data binding along from the beginning, and data could also flow between the UI and the binding source in both directions, one aspect was missing. Up to now, there wasn’t a “bindable” way to connect business logic methods in the data source – or more accurately: the UI-Controller or ViewModel – with the UI. The goal with the separation of concerns is that a form or UserControl shouldn’t execute code which manipulates business data. It should leave that task completely to that UI Controller. Now, in the spirit of MVVM, the approach is to connect an element of the UI to the a method inside UI-Controller, so when the UI Element is engaged in the UI, the respective method in the Controller (the ViewModel) is executed. These methods, which are responsible for the domain-specific functionality inside a ViewModel, are called Commands. For linking these ViewModel commands with the user interface, MVVM utilizes Command Binding which is based on types implementing the ICommand interface. Those types can then be used in UI Controllers like ViewModels to define properties so they don’t hold the actual code to be executed, they rather point to the methods which get automatically executed when the UI Element the Command is bound to in the View gets engaged.

Note: Although ICommand is located in the Namespace System.Windows.Input which in principle points to namespaces used in the WPF context, ICommand doesn’t have any dependencies to any existing UI Stack in .NET or the .NET Framework. Rather, ICommand is used across all .NET based UI Stacks, including WPF, .NET MAUI, WinUI, UWP, and now also WinForms.

If you have a Command defined in your ViewModel, you also need Command properties in UI elements to bind against. To make this possible for the .NET 7 WinForms runtime, we made several changes to WinForms controls and components:

  • Introduced Command for ButtonBase: ButtonBase got a Command property of type ICommand. That means that the controls Button, CheckBox and RadioButton in WinForms also now have a Command property as will every WinForms control derived either from Button or ButtonBase.
  • Introduced BindableComponent: The WinForms .NET 7 runtime introduced BindableComponent. Before, components were not intrinsically bindable in WinForms, they were missing the necessary binding infrastructure. BindableComponent derives from Component and provides the infrastructure to create properties for a component, which can be bound.
  • Made ToolStripItem bindable: ToolStripItem no longer derives from Component but rather now from BindableComponent. This was necessary, since ToolStripButton and ToolStripMenuItem are desired candidates for command binding targets, but for that they need to be able to be bound to begin with.
  • Introduced Command for ToolStripItem: ToolStripItem also got a Command property of type ICommand. Although every component derived from ToolStripItem now has a Command property, especially ToolStripButton, ToolStripDropDownButton, ToolStripMenuItem and ToolStripSplitButton are ideal candidates for command binding due to their UI characteristics.
  • Introduced CommandParameter properties: For a simplified passing of Command parameters, both ButtonBase and ToolStripItem got a CommandParameter property. When a command gets executed, the content of CommandParameter is automatically passed to the command’s method in the UI-Controller/ViewModel.
  • Introduced public events for new properties: Both ButtonBased and ToolStripItem got the new events CommandCanExecuteChanged, CommandChanged and CommandParameterChanged. With these events the new properties are supported by the binding infrastructure of WinForms and make the those properties bindable.
  • Introduced (protected) OnRequestCommandExecute: Overriding OnRequestCommandExecute allows ButtonBase– or ToolStripItem-derived classes to intercept the request to execute a command when the user has clicked a bound command control or component. The derived control can then decide not to invoke the bound UI Controller’s or ViewModel’s command by simply not calling the base class’s method.

Controlling Command Execution and Command Availability by Utilizing Relay Commands

Since ICommand is just an interface which mandates properties and methods, a UI-Controller or ViewModel needs to use a concrete class instance, which implements the ICommand interface.

The ICommand interface has three methods:

  • Execute: This method is called when the command is invoked. It contain the domain specific the logic.
  • CanExecute: This method is called whenever the command’s context to execute changes. It returns a boolean value indicating the command’s availability.
  • CanExecuteChanged: This event is raised whenever the value of the CanExecute method changes.

    One typical implementation of a class implementing ICommand is called RelayCommand, and a simplified version would look like this:

    // Implementation of ICommand - simplified version not taking parameters into account.
    public class RelayCommand : ICommand
        public event EventHandler? CanExecuteChanged;

        private readonly Action _commandAction;
        private readonly Func<bool>? _canExecuteCommandAction;

        public RelayCommand(Action commandAction, Func<bool>? canExecuteCommandAction = null)
            ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull(commandAction, nameof(commandAction));

            _commandAction = commandAction;
            _canExecuteCommandAction = canExecuteCommandAction;

        // Implicit interface implementations, since there will never be the necessity to call this 
        // method directly. It will always exclusively be called by the bound command control.
        bool ICommand.CanExecute(object? parameter)
            => _canExecuteCommandAction is null || _canExecuteCommandAction.Invoke();

        void ICommand.Execute(object? parameter)
            => _commandAction.Invoke();

        /// <summary>
        ///  Triggers sending a notification, that the command availability has changed.
        /// </summary>
        public void NotifyCanExecuteChanged()
            => CanExecuteChanged?.Invoke(this, EventArgs.Empty);

When you bind the Command property of a control against a property of type RelayCommand (or any other implementation of ICommand), two things happen:

  • Whenever the user engages the control (by clicking or pressing the related shortcut key on the keyboard), the Action defined for the RelayCommand gets executed.
  • The control whose Command property is bound gets disabled when the execution context changes. The execution context is controlled by the CanExecute method of the RelayCommand. When it returns false, it indicates that the command cannot be executed. In that case, the control gets automatically disabled. When it returns true, the opposite happens: the control gets enabled.

Note: The execution context of a command is usually controlled by the UI Controller/ViewModel. It might be affected by the UI alright, but it’s the ultimate decision of the ViewModel to enable or disable a command based on some domain specific context. The sample code below will give a practical example how to to enable or disable a command’s execution context based on a user’s input.

Additional WinForms Binding Features in .NET 7

In addition to the new binding features, we added a new general data binding infrastructure feature on Control: For an easier cascading of data source population in nested Forms (for example a form holds UserControls which hold other UserControls which hold custom controls etc.), .NET 7 also introduced a DataContext property of type Object on Control. This property has ambient characteristics (like BackColor or Font). That means when you assign a data source instance to DataContext, that instance gets automatically delegated down to every child control of the form. Currently, the DataContext property does simply serve the purpose of a data source carrier, but does not affect any bindings directly. It is still the duty of the control to then delegate a new data source down to the respective BindingSource components, where it makes sense. Examples:

  • UserControls, which are used inside of Forms, utilize dedicated BindingSource components for internal binding scenarios. They all need to be taken from one central data source. This data source can now be handed down from the parent control via its DataContext property. When the DataContext property gets assigned to the form, not only will every child control of the controls collection of this parent have that same DataContext – as soon as the data source of the parent’s DataContext changes, all the children receive the DataContextChange event, so they know they can provide their BindingSource‘s DataSource properties with whatever updated data source their domain-specific context requires. We cover this scenario also in the sample app down below.
  • If you have implemented data binding scenarios with custom binding engines, you can also use DataContext to simplify binding scenarios and make them more robust. In derived controls, you can overwrite OnDataContextChanged to control the change notification of the DataContext, and you can use OnParentDataContextChanged to intercept notifications, when the parent control notifies its child controls that the DataContext property has changed.

Binding Commands and ViewModels with the WinForms out-of-proc Designer

Now, let’s put all of the puzzle pieces we’ve covered so far together, and apply them in a very simple WinForms App:

A WinForms form in the Designer with a CheckBox, a Button, a Label, serving as a sample MVVM view.

The idea here is to have a form which is controlled by a ViewModel, providing a Command and properties to bind against the CheckBox control and the Label. When the Button is engaged, the bound command in the ViewModel gets executed, changing the CommandResult property which states how often the Button has been clicked. Since CommandResult is bound against the Label, the UI reflects this result. The CheckBox in this scenario controls the availability of the command. When the CheckBox is checked, the command is available. Therefore, the button is enabled, since the command’s CanExecute method returns true. As soon as the CheckBox’ check state changes, the bound SampleCommandAvailability gets updated, and its setter gets executed. That in turn invokes the NotifyCanExecuteChanged method. That again triggers the execution of the command’s CanExecute method, which now returns the updated execution context and automatically updates the enabled state of the bound button so it becomes disabled.

The business logic for this application is completely implemented in the ViewModel. Except for what is in InitializeComponent to setup the form’s controls, the form only holds the code to setup the ViewModel as the form’s data source.

public class SimpleCommandViewModel : INotifyPropertyChanged
        // The event that is fired when a property changes.
        public event PropertyChangedEventHandler? PropertyChanged;

        // Backing field for the properties.
        private bool _sampleCommandAvailability;
        private RelayCommand _sampleCommand;
        private string _sampleCommandResult = "* not invoked yet *";
        private int _invokeCount;

        public SimpleCommandViewModel()
            _sampleCommand = new RelayCommand(ExecuteSampleCommand, CanExecuteSampleCommand);

        /// <summary>
        ///  Controls the command availability and is bound to the CheckBox of the Form.
        /// </summary>
        public bool SampleCommandAvailability
            get => _sampleCommandAvailability;
                if (_sampleCommandAvailability == value)

                _sampleCommandAvailability = value;

                // When this property changes we need to notify the UI that the command availability has changed.
                // The command's availability is reflected through the button's enabled state, which is - 
                // because its command property is bound - automatically updated.

                // Notify the UI that the property has changed.

        /// <summary>
        ///  Command that is bound to the button of the Form.
        ///  When the button is clicked, the command is executed.
        /// </summary>
        public RelayCommand SampleCommand
            get => _sampleCommand;
                if (_sampleCommand == value)

                _sampleCommand = value;

        /// <summary>
        ///  The result of the command execution, which is bound to the Form's label.
        /// </summary>
        public string SampleCommandResult
            get => _sampleCommandResult;
                if (_sampleCommandResult == value)

                _sampleCommandResult = value;

        /// <summary>
        ///  Method that is executed when the command is invoked.
        /// </summary>
        public void ExecuteSampleCommand()
            => SampleCommandResult = $"Command invoked {_invokeCount++} times.";

        /// <summary>
        ///  Method that determines whether the command can be executed. It reflects the 
        ///  property CommandAvailability, which in turn is bound to the CheckBox of the Form.
        /// </summary>
        public bool CanExecuteSampleCommand()
            => SampleCommandAvailability;

        // Notify the UI that one of the properties has changed.
        private void OnPropertyChanged([CallerMemberName] string propertyName = "")
            => PropertyChanged?.Invoke(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));

Setting up the form and the ViewModel through binding in WinForms is of course different than it is in typical XAML languages like WPF, UWP or .NET MAUI. But it’s pretty quick and 100% in the spirit of WinForms.

Note: Please keep in mind that the out-of-process Designer doesn’t support the Data Source Provider Service, which is responsible for providing the classic Framework Data Sources Window. The data binding blog post tells more about the background. So, in a .NET WinForms App at this point you cannot interactively create Typed DataSets with the Designer or add existing Typed DataSets as data sources through the Data Sources tool window. Keep also in mind that although there is no Designer support to add Typed DataSets as data sources, the out-of-process Designer for .NET does support binding against Typed DataSets of already defined data sources (which have been brought over from a .NET Framework application just by copying the files structure of a project).

The out-of-process Designer provides an easier alternative to hook up new Object Data Sources, which can be based on ViewModels as described here, but also based on classes which results from Entity Framework or EFCore. The Microsoft docs provide a neat guide how to work with EFCore and this new Feature to create a simple data bound WinForms application.

To set up the bindings for the ViewModel to the sample WinForms UI, follow these steps:

  1. Open and design the form in the WinForms out-of-process Designer according to the screenshot above.

  2. Select the Button control by clicking on it.

  3. In the Property Browser, scroll to the top, find the (DataBindings) property and open it.

  4. Find the row for the Command property, and open the Design Binding Picker by clicking the arrow-down button at the end of the cell.

    Screenshot showing the open Design Binding Picker to add a new object data source.

  5. In the Design Binding Picker, click on Add new Object Data Source.

  6. The Designer now shows the Add Object Data Source-Dialog. In this dialog, click on the class you want to add, and then click OK.

    Screenshot showing the new Add Object Data Source dialog.

  7. After closing the dialog, the new data source becomes available, and you can find the SampleCommand property in the Design Binding Picker and assign it to the Button’s Command property.

    Screenshot showing how to pick a command from a ViewModel in the Design Binding Picker.

  8. Select the CheckBox control in the form, and bind its Checked property to the ViewModel’s CommandAvailability property. Please note from the following screenshot: The previous step automatically inserted the required BindingSource component, which is in most cases common to use as a mediator for binding and syncing between several control instances (like the current line of a bound DataGridView and a detail view on the same Form). When you earlier picked the SampleCommand property directly from the ViewModel, the Designer created the BindingSource based on that pick and then selected that property from the BindingSource. Successive bindings on this form should now be picked directly from that BindingSource instance.

    Screenshot showing the binding of the CheckBox against CommandAvailability of the ViewModel.

  9. Select the Label control in the form, and bind its Text property to the ViewModel’s CommandResult property.

The only code now which needs to be run in the form directly, is the hook up of the ViewModel with the form using the BindingSource at runtime:

        protected override void OnLoad(EventArgs e)
            simpleCommandViewModelBindingSource.DataSource = new SimpleCommandViewModel();

Using the MVVM community toolkit for streamlined coding

For more complex scenarios, developing the domain-specific MVVM classes would require writing comparatively expensive boilerplate code. Typically, developers using XAML-based UI stacks like WPF or .NET MAUI use a library called MVVM Community Toolkit to utilize the many provided MVVM-base classes of that library, but also to let code generators do the writing of this kind of code wherever it makes sense.

To use the MVVM community toolkit, you just need to add the respective NuGet reference CommunityToolkit.Mvvm to the project which is hosting the ViewModel classes for your app.

Screenshot showing how to add the Microsoft CommunityToolkit.MVVM package to a project

The introduction to the MVVM community toolkit explains the steps in more detail.

Our more complex MVVM-Editor sample uses the Toolkit for different disciplines:

  • ObservableObject: ViewModels in the Editor sample app use ObservableObject as their base class (indirectly through WinFormsViewController – take a look at the source code of the sample for additional background info). It implements INotifyPropertyChanged and encapsulates all the necessary property notification Infrastructure.
  • RelayCommand: If the dedicated implementation of Commands is necessary, use the Toolkit’s RelayCommand, which is an extended version of the class which you already learned about earlier.

What really helps saving time though, are the code generators the MVVM Community Toolkit provides. Instead of writing the implementation for a bindable ViewModel property yourself, you just need to apply the ObservableProperty attribute over the backing field, and the code generators do the rest:

    /// <summary>
    ///  UI-Controller class for controlling the main editor Window and most of the editor's functionality.
    /// </summary>
    public partial class MainFormController : WinFormsViewController
        /// <summary>
        ///  Current length of the selection.
        /// </summary>
        private int _selectionLength;

You can save even more time by using the RelayCommand attribute, which you put on top of the command methods of your ViewModel. In this case, the Command property which you need to bind against the View is completely generated by the Toolkit, along with the code which hooks up the command. If the command needs to take a related CanExecuteCommand method into account in addition, you can provide that method like shown in the code snippet below. It doesn’t really matter if the method is an async method or not. In this example, converting the whole text into upper case is done inside a dedicated task to show that asynchronous methods are in WinForms as valid as synchronous methods as a base for command code generation.

        [RelayCommand(CanExecute = nameof(CanExecuteContentDependingCommands))]
        private async Task ToUpperAsync()
            string tempText = null!;
            var savedSelectionIndex = SelectionIndex;

            await Task.Run(() =>
                var upperText = TextDocument[SelectionIndex..(SelectionIndex + SelectionLength)].ToUpper();

                tempText = string.Concat(
                    TextDocument[(SelectionIndex + SelectionLength)..].AsSpan());

            TextDocument = tempText;
            SelectionIndex = savedSelectionIndex;

Those are just a few examples, how the Toolkit supports you, and how the Editor sample app uses the Toolkit in several spots. Refer to the toolkit’s documentation for additional information.

Honoring Preview Features in the Runtime and the out-of-proc WinForms Designer

The WinForms Command Binding feature is currently under preview. That means, we might introduce additional functionality for the .NET 8 time frame for it or slightly change implementation details, based on feedback. So, feedback is really important to us, especially with this feature!

When you use features which have been marked as in preview – and please note, that also in a release version of .NET there can be features still in preview – you need to acknowledge in your app that you aware of using a preview feature. You do that by adding a special tag named EnablePreviewFeatures into your csproj file (or vbproj for Visual Basic .NET 7 projects), like this. The Preview Features Design Document describes this feature in detail.

<Project Sdk="Microsoft.NET.Sdk">


This way, the whole assembly is automatically attributed with RequiresPreviewFeatures. If you omit this, and you use preview features of the WinForms runtime, like the Command property of a button control in .NET 7, you would see the following error message:

Screenshot of the error list tool window showing messages which result from using runtime features  marked in preview.

In addition, if you tried to bind against a property of the runtime in preview, instead of the Design Binding Picker, you would see an error message, stating that you needed to enable preview features as described.

Screenshot of the Design Binding Picker with message that binding to properties in preview is not allowed.

Reusing WinForms ViewModels in .NET MAUI Apps

Examining the WinForms sample app, you will see that the actual MainForm of the app doesn’t consist of a lot of code:

public partial class MainForm : Form
    public MainForm()

    protected override void OnLoad(EventArgs e)
        DataContext = new MainFormController(SimpleServiceProvider.GetInstance());

    private void MainForm_DataContextChanged(object sender, EventArgs e)
        => _mainFormControllerBindingSource.DataSource = DataContext;

This is really all there is: On loading the app’s main form, we create an instance of the MainFormController and pass in a service provider. The MainFormController serves as the ViewModel which holds every aspect of the business logic – the animated gif above does show, what that means: Reporting the cursor position, creating a new document, wrapping text or converting the whole text to upper case characters – the ViewModel provides every command to do that, and all the methods are assigned to the view (the main form) via command binding.

We already saw how the command binding is done with the new Command Binding features in WinForms .NET 7. In .NET MAUI, command binding to an existing ViewModel can be done via XAML data binding. Without going too much into detail of that actual topic, this is a small excerpt of the .NET MAUI sample app’s XAML code:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<ContentPage xmlns=""

        <Grid Margin="0,8,0,0">
                <ColumnDefinition Width="*"/>
                <ColumnDefinition Width="Auto"/>

                Text="WinForms/Maui Edit"


                    Command="{Binding NewDocumentCommand}"/>

                    Text="Insert Demo Text" 
                    Command="{Binding InsertDemoTextCommand}"/>

Basically, while the WinForms designer provides a UI for linking up the commands of a data source with the form interactively, in XAML based UI stacks it is common practice to write the XAML code to design the UI, and add the binding directly in that process.

The Microsoft docs hold more information about XAML data binding in the context of MVVM and command binding (which is also called Commanding).

One additional aspect is important to point out in the context of reusing a ViewModel for different UI stacks like WinForms and .NET MAUI: When the user clicks, as one example, on New Document, the respective command is executed in the ViewModel. As you can observe in the application’s live demo gif: The user is then prompted in the WinForms version with a Task Dialog, and is asked if deleting the current text is OK. Taking a look at the respective ViewModel’s code, we see the following method:

    [RelayCommand(CanExecute = nameof(CanExecuteContentDependingCommands))]
    private async Task NewDocumentAsync()
        // So, this is how we control the UI via a Controller or ViewModel.
        // We get the required Service over the ServiceProvider, 
        // which the Controller/ViewModels got via Dependency Injection.
        // Dependency Injection means, _depending_ on what UI-Stack (or even inside a Unit Test)
        // we're actually running, the dialogService will do different things:

        // * On WinForms it shows a WinForms MessageBox.
        // * On .NET MAUI, it displays an alert.
        // * In the context of a unit test, it doesn't show anything: the unit test,
        //   just pretends, the user had clicked the result button.
        var dialogService = ServiceProvider.GetRequiredService<IDialogService>();

        // Now we use this DialogService to remote-control the UI completely
        // _and_ independent of the actual UI technology.
        var buttonString = await dialogService.ShowMessageBoxAsync(
            title: "New Document",
            heading: "Do you want to create a new Document?",
            message: "You are about to create a new Document. The old document will be erased, changes you made will be lost.",
            buttons: new[] { YesButtonText, NoButtonText });

        if (buttonString == YesButtonText)
            TextDocument = string.Empty;

Of course, the ViewModel must not call WinForms TaskDialog directly. After all, the ViewModel is supposed to be reused in or with other UI stacks and cannot have any dependencies on assemblies of a particular UI stack. So, when our ViewModel is used in the context of a WinForms app, it’s supposed to show a WinForms TaskDialog. If, however, it’s run in the context of a .NET MAUI app, it is supposed to display an alert. Depending on in what context the ViewModel is executed, it effectively needs to do different things. To overcome this, we inject the ViewModel on instantiation with a service provider, which provides an abstract way to interact with the respective UI elements. In WinForms, we pass the service for a WinForms dialog service. In .NET MAUI, we pass the service for a .NET MAUI dialog service:

    public static MauiApp CreateMauiApp()
        var builder = MauiApp.CreateBuilder();

        // We pass the dialog service to the service provider, so we can use it in the view models.
        builder.Services.AddSingleton(typeof(IDialogService), new MauiDialogService());

            .ConfigureFonts(fonts =>
                fonts.AddFont("OpenSans-Regular.ttf", "OpenSansRegular");
                fonts.AddFont("OpenSans-Semibold.ttf", "OpenSansSemibold");


        return builder.Build();

With this, the ViewModel doesn’t need to know what exactly is going to happen, if for example the dialogService.ShowMessageAsync is called. DialogService will call different things depending on the UI context. This is the reason this approach is called dependency injection. The easiest way to learn and get a feeling what exactly is happening in both cases, is to just debug in single steps through the code paths in both apps and observe what parts are being used in the respective UI stacks. Please also note, that this sample is using the dialog service in a very simplistic way. You can find more powerful libraries on the web which are dedicated to that purpose.

Unit testing ViewModels with dependency injection

The Editor sample solution uses the same approach to provide a Unit Test (inside the solution’s unit test project) for the ViewModel. In this case, the ViewModel also gets injected with the service provider to retrieve a dialog service at runtime. This time, however, the dialog service’s purpose is not to show something visually or interact with the user, but to rather emulate the user’s input:

    public Task<string> ShowMessageBoxAsync(
        string title, string heading, string message, params string[] buttons)
        ShowMessageBoxResultEventArgs eArgs = new();
        ShowMessageBoxRequested?.Invoke(this, eArgs);

        if (eArgs.ResultButtonText is null)
            throw new NullReferenceException("MessageBox test result can't be null.");

        return Task.FromResult(eArgs.ResultButtonText);

When the ViewModel is supposed to show the MessageBox, rather than to actually show an UI component, an event is fired. This event can be then handled by the unit test method, and the emulated user response is just passed as the event result:

        // We simulate the user requesting to 'New' the document,
        // but says "No" on the MessageDialogBox to actually clear it.
        dialogService!.ShowMessageBoxRequested += DialogService_ShowMessageBoxRequested;

        // We test the first time; our state machine returns "No" the first time.
        await mainFormController.NewDocumentCommand.ExecuteAsync(null);
        Assert.Equal(MainFormController.GetTestText(), mainFormController.TextDocument);

        // We test the second time; our state machine returns "Yes" the first time.
        await mainFormController.NewDocumentCommand.ExecuteAsync(null);
        Assert.Equal(String.Empty, mainFormController.TextDocument);

        void DialogService_ShowMessageBoxRequested(object? sender, ShowMessageBoxResultEventArgs e)
            => e.ResultButtonText = dialogState++ switch {
                0 => MainFormController.NoButtonText,
                1 => MainFormController.YesButtonText,
                _ => string.Empty


Command Binding in WinForms will make it easier to modernize WinForms applications in a feasible way. Separating the UI from the business logic by introducing UI Controller can be done step by step over time. Introducing unit tests will make your WinForms app more robust. Using ViewModels in additional UI stacks like .NET MAUI allows you to take parts of a LOB app cross-platform and have Mobile Apps for areas where it makes sense. Additionally, the adoption of Azure services becomes much easier with a sound architecture, and essential code can also be easily shared with the Mobile App’s spin-off.

Feedback about the subject matter is really important to us, so please let us know your thoughts and additional ideas! We’re also interested about what additional topics of this area you would like hear about from us. Please also note that the WinForms .NET runtime is open source, and you can contribute! If you have general feature ideas, encountered bugs, or even want to take on existing issues around the WinForms runtime and submit PRs, have a look at the WinForms Github repo. If you have suggestions around the WinForms Designer, feel free to file new issues there as well.

Happy coding!


Comments are closed. Login to edit/delete your existing comments

  • George Karabin 4

    Coming at this as a Xamarin.Forms developer moving to MAUI, it’s eye-opening to see what the lift-and-shift looks like for WinForns folks. The complexity of building a maintainable system that raises all the boats in the lake kind of boggles the mind. I look forward to seeing WinForms folks driving the ecosystem to the benefit of us all in the mobile space.

    • Rich Howard 1

      Ha! I am one of those “WinForn” folks!
      The ability to use object oriented principles all the way through, from UI to business logic is the only reason I could ever make an app as big as Assisi Forest. OOP principles offer the only viable way to organize it all. Yes, modern declarative UI seems like the correct approach today, but it only addresses UI and does this at the cost of UI inheritance. I am not sure declarative UI at the cost of inherited UI would be wise, even today.

  • Stevie White 3

    This is amazing to me. And I agree that Windows Forms itself has always been one of the most powerful RAD frameworks that have ever existed. I personally have used libraries with Windows Forms in the past to facilitate MVVM (DevExpress’ own framework is my personal favorite). I must commend you Klaus and the rest of the team at Microsoft for continuing to improve upon Forms.

    As for improvements, I would love to see some way to make faster adjustments to the designer/resx files. That is one of the biggest advantages IMO that MAUI, WinUi and WPF have over Windows Forms, based upon my own firsthand experiences. With Forms, I have found that the time (and physical/ergonomic) work on the UI grows at a much faster rate than when dealing with the “markup first” approach that the XAML based workloads provide. I know that’s a complex problem to solve though and it would require a more dedicated discussion, but that is a potential area that would help current windows forms developers. I also suspect this would enhance the perception of Windows Forms and Visual Studio. 🙂

    Again, this is amazing news and I really appreciate the time you and the rest of the team have put into Windows Forms for Dot Net 7. Here’s hoping to a great 2023 for you and the rest of your colleagues at Microsoft!

    • Jan Seriš 2

      If you prefer XAML, you should stick with the XAML technologies. One of the things that WinForms is great for rapid and easy development is the 100 % capable designer. None of the other technologies have such capable visual designer.

  • Mauro 0

    Using ReactiveUI with a fresh new WinForms project and we get this and a lot more for free (and production ready). Same patterns explained here, but just more developer-friendly and with the power of Reactive programming and ReactiveData. I suggest to take a look to it if you are interested to this programming model.

    • Klaus LoeffelmannMicrosoft employee 0

      Yes, certainly also a very good alternative approach – thanks for pointing this out!

      Using the Designer for Binding emphasizes the original WinForms way to do things. For brand new WinForms LOB Applications, ReactiveUI is certainly worth taking into consideration. For existing apps, the Command Binding approach might be more suitable depending on the exact context and existing architecture, also, if folks want to reuse it with classing XAML Binding in other XAML UI stacks.

  • Neno Loje 0

    Hi Klaus,
    looks like one image didn’t render property – see:

    :::image type=”content” source=”EngageAddDataSourceDialog.png” alt-text=”Screenshot showing the open Design Binding Picker to add a new object data source.”:::

    All the best,
    MVP, Azure DevOps

    • Klaus LoeffelmannMicrosoft employee 0

      Hey Neno,

      You’re right: there is still one in which has the wrong format. Gonna fix that – thanks!

      We had issues with image-rendering in the first published version, which should be fixed now. You should refresh later to make sure you get the changes.



  • Gary Des Roches 0

    I’ve read the article. I am moving from my current custom method of UI extraction to this one, and I am trying to bind a simple command to a button. What exactly is required for the Object Data Source to show up in the ViewModel?

    All of my projects have preview features enabled. I have the [RelayCommand] attribute on the method which executes the logic on my ViewModel which is generating the public property StartCommand of type IRelayCommand. I am trying to add it as an object data source to “Command” under “Data Bindings,” for the Button in my Form but nothing shows up. So, I “Add Object Data Source,” and again nothing shows up. I remove all of the filters still to no avail. What am I missing? I have a reference to the project containing the type which I’ve confirmed as I can see it and use it.

    • Klaus LoeffelmannMicrosoft employee 0

      You should see your ViewModel in the Add Object Data Source Dialog. Classes which implement INotifyPropertyChanged (or derived from ObservableObject, if you use the MVVM Toolkit), btw, are listed here in bold type face, so they are easier to spot. That ViewModel, which is supposed to contain your commands, need to be added as an Object Data Source. If that is done, on binding a Button’s command, you should see the ViewModel in the Design Binding Picker with all the command listed below its branch. If that is not working for you, please report an issue in the WinForms GitHub repo, so we can take a closer look.

  • 威尔 龙 0

    can .NET MAUI run in Linux Desktop now ?

Feedback usabilla icon