April 1st, 2026
mind blowncompelling2 reactions

The cover of C++: The Programming Language raises questions not answered by the cover

Raymond Chen
Raymond Chen

The book C++: The Programming Language¹ (Waylon Warren, editor) claims to present “the complex subject of C++ in the most comprehensible and easy to understand language.” A rather overdone book blurb, in my opinion.

Anyway, the book does have an attractive cover, or at least an inoffensive one.

Book cover: C++ The Programming Language, with a picture of code on a computer monitor

But wait, let’s zoom in on the code shown on the computer monitor.

See article text for transcription

function updatePhotoDescription() {
    if (descriptions.length > (page * 9) + (currentImage.substring(⟦ blurry ⟧')) {
        document.getElementById("bigImageDesc").innerHTML + ⟦ blurry ⟧
    }
}

function updateAllImages() {
    var i = 1;
    while (i < 10) {
        var elementId = 'foto' + i;
        var elementIdBig = 'bigImage' + i;
        if (page * 9 + i - 1 < photos.length) {
            document.getElementById( elementId ).src = 'images/⟦ blurry ⟧
            document.getElementById( elementIdBig ).src = 'images/⟦ blurry ⟧
        } else {
            document.getElementById( elementId ).src = '';

This isn’t even C++. It’s JavaScript!

¹ Note that this is not the book The C++ Programming Language by the language inventor Bjarne Stroustrup.

Category
Old New Thing
Topics
Other

Author

Raymond Chen

Raymond has been involved in the evolution of Windows for more than 30 years. In 2003, he began a Web site known as The Old New Thing which has grown in popularity far beyond his wildest imagination, a development which still gives him the heebie-jeebies. The Web site spawned a book, coincidentally also titled The Old New Thing (Addison Wesley 2007). He occasionally appears on the Windows Dev Docs Twitter account to tell stories which convey no useful information.

2 comments

Sort by :
  • Letao Wang 52 seconds ago · Edited

    Maybe “the most comprehensible and easy to understand language” was in fact referring to JavaScript.
    ;P

  • LB 12 minutes ago

    It’s also not very good JavaScript either – using while instead of for, using var instead of const and let, etc. I often wonder where such stock code photos originate from.

Read next