{"id":41173,"date":"2004-01-07T07:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-01-07T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.msdn.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/2004\/01\/07\/words-id-like-to-ban-in-2004\/"},"modified":"2004-01-07T07:00:00","modified_gmt":"2004-01-07T07:00:00","slug":"words-id-like-to-ban-in-2004","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/20040107-00\/?p=41173","title":{"rendered":"Words I&#039;d like to ban in 2004"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>It seems to be fashionable to do a &#8220;top words&#8221; list this time of year. We have <a href=\"http:\/\/www.google.com\/press\/zeitgeist.html\">Google 2003 Zeitgeist<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/search.yahoo.com\/top2003\">Top Yahoo! Searches 2003<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.merriam-webster.com\/info\/03words.htm\">Merriam-Webster&#8217;s Words of the Year for 2003<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.yourdictionary.com\/about\/topten2003.html\">YourDictionary.com&#8217;s Top Ten Words of 2003<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lssu.edu\/banished\/archive\/2004.php\"> Lake Superior State University&#8217;s Banished Words List for 2004<\/a>; still waiting for the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.americandialect.org\/woty.html\">American Dialect Society&#8217;s choice for Word of the Year for 2003<\/a>. <\/p>\n<p> I like <a href=\"http:\/\/www.lssu.edu\/\">LSSU<\/a>&#8216;s approach, so here&#8217;s my list of words I&#8217;d like to ban. <\/p>\n<dl>\n<dt>Best-of-Breed<\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p> Thank goodness this has faded, but there are still some citations out there. Please don&#8217;t use it to describe my work. It makes me sound like a dog in a show. (No offense to dogs in shows!) <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<dt>Leading<\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p> Everybody is &#8220;the leading this&#8221; or &#8220;the leading that&#8221;. Here&#8217;s my rule: If you say you&#8217;re the leading XYZ or (even dodgier) &#8220;among the leading XYZs&#8221;, then have to list at least three companies that are <em>not<\/em> leaders in the XYZ market. Because if nobody is following you, then you&#8217;re not really &#8220;leading&#8221;, now, are you. <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n<p> And the word I most would like to banish from the English language: <\/p>\n<dl>\n<dt>Ask (as a noun)<\/dt>\n<dd>\n<p> This has taken over Microsoft-speak in the past year or so and it drives me batty.  &#8220;What are our key asks here?&#8221;, you might hear in a meeting.  Language tip: The thing you are asking for is called a &#8220;request&#8221;. Plus, of course, the thing that is an &#8220;ask&#8221; is usually more of a &#8220;demand&#8221; or &#8220;requirement&#8221;. But those are such unfriendly words, aren&#8217;t they? Why not use a warm, fuzzy word like &#8220;ask&#8221; to take the edge off? <\/p>\n<p> Answer: Because it&#8217;s not a word. <\/p>\n<p> I have yet to find any dictionary which sanctions this usage. Indeed, the only definition for &#8220;ask&#8221; as a noun is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bootlegbooks.com\/Reference\/Webster\/data\/89.html\"> A water newt [Scot. &amp; North of Eng.]<\/a>, and that was from 1913! <\/p>\n<p> Answer 2: Because it&#8217;s passive-aggressive. <\/p>\n<p> These &#8220;asks&#8221; are really &#8220;demands&#8221;. So don&#8217;t guilt-trip me with &#8220;Oh, you didn&#8217;t meet our ask. We had to cut half our features. But that&#8217;s okay. We&#8217;ll just suffer quietly, you go do your thing, don&#8217;t mind us.&#8221; <\/p>\n<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It seems to be fashionable to do a &#8220;top words&#8221; list this time of year. We have Google 2003 Zeitgeist, Top Yahoo! Searches 2003, Merriam-Webster&#8217;s Words of the Year for 2003, YourDictionary.com&#8217;s Top Ten Words of 2003, Lake Superior State University&#8217;s Banished Words List for 2004; still waiting for the American Dialect Society&#8217;s choice for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1069,"featured_media":111744,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[105,26],"class_list":["post-41173","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-oldnewthing","tag-microspeak","tag-other"],"acf":[],"blog_post_summary":"<p>It seems to be fashionable to do a &#8220;top words&#8221; list this time of year. We have Google 2003 Zeitgeist, Top Yahoo! Searches 2003, Merriam-Webster&#8217;s Words of the Year for 2003, YourDictionary.com&#8217;s Top Ten Words of 2003, Lake Superior State University&#8217;s Banished Words List for 2004; still waiting for the American Dialect Society&#8217;s choice for [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1069"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41173"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41173\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/111744"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}