{"id":37663,"date":"2004-10-04T07:02:00","date_gmt":"2004-10-04T07:02:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.msdn.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/2004\/10\/04\/those-partisan-non-partisan-groups\/"},"modified":"2004-10-04T07:02:00","modified_gmt":"2004-10-04T07:02:00","slug":"those-partisan-non-partisan-groups","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/20041004-00\/?p=37663","title":{"rendered":"Those partisan non-partisan groups"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Just because they say they&#8217;re non-partisan doesn&#8217;t mean that they&#8217;re non-partisan.<\/p>\n<p> Friday night, I got a phone call from &#8220;Victor&#8221; at &#8220;Washington Counts&#8221; who came right out and asked me whom I was going to vote for. <\/p>\n<p> I asked him to repeat the name of the organization he represents, and he said, &#8220;Washington Counts, a non-partisan organization, working in cooperation with Emily&#8217;s List.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p> I couldn&#8217;t find any information about &#8220;Washington Counts&#8221;, but I did find <a href=\"http:\/\/www.emilyslist.org\/\">Emily&#8217;s List<\/a>, which is a blatantly partisan group. Their own <a href=\"http:\/\/www.emilyslist.org\/about\/\">About Page<\/a> say that they are &#8220;dedicated to&#8230; electing pro-choice Democratic women&#8221;. <\/p>\n<p> I pointed out to &#8220;Victor&#8221; that Emily&#8217;s List is a partisan group.  He ignored me and repeated his question, asking me whom I was going to vote for. <\/p>\n<p> I told him that I was unlikely to be inclined to assist an organization that start out by lying to me. <\/p>\n<p> And then I heard a click and a recorded voice saying, &#8220;This survey was sponsored by Emily&#8217;s List. On the web at www.emilyslist.org.&#8221; <\/p>\n<p> Let&#8217;s see what happened here.  Somebody claimed to be from &#8220;Washington Counts&#8221;, but in fact they were from &#8220;Emily&#8217;s List&#8221;. [Corrected identification 9:38am.] That person claimed to be representing a non-partisan group, but in fact the group is highly partisan. <\/p>\n<p> I guess if you&#8217;re going to lie, you may as well go all-out. <\/p>\n<p> Of course, this could have been a double-fake-out. Perhaps it was really a pro-life Republican group <strong>pretending<\/strong> to be a pro-choice Democratic group? <\/p>\n<p> These sorts of double-fake-outs are not unheard of. In California, anybody who pays the requisite fee can get a statement printed in the voter&#8217;s guide. It has been known to occur that somebody who holds one position on an issue submits <strong>an incoherent or absurd statement in support of the opposition position<\/strong>, thereby making the opposition look stupid. During the 1996 U.S. presidential election primary season, Candidate&nbsp;X sponsored a telephone survey asking voters &#8220;If Candidate&nbsp;Y took &lt;controversial position&gt;, would your opinion of Candidate&nbsp;Y go up, down, or stay the same?&#8221; The intent here was to start the rumor that Candidate&nbsp;Y was actually considering taking said controversial position (which would have undermined Candidate&nbsp;Y&#8217;s traditional support). <\/p>\n<p> You can never tell where the dirty tricks are coming from in politics. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Just because they say they&#8217;re non-partisan doesn&#8217;t mean that they&#8217;re non-partisan. Friday night, I got a phone call from &#8220;Victor&#8221; at &#8220;Washington Counts&#8221; who came right out and asked me whom I was going to vote for. I asked him to repeat the name of the organization he represents, and he said, &#8220;Washington Counts, a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1069,"featured_media":111744,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[103],"class_list":["post-37663","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-oldnewthing","tag-non-computer"],"acf":[],"blog_post_summary":"<p>Just because they say they&#8217;re non-partisan doesn&#8217;t mean that they&#8217;re non-partisan. Friday night, I got a phone call from &#8220;Victor&#8221; at &#8220;Washington Counts&#8221; who came right out and asked me whom I was going to vote for. I asked him to repeat the name of the organization he represents, and he said, &#8220;Washington Counts, a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37663","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1069"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37663"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37663\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/111744"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37663"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}