{"id":22333,"date":"2008-05-14T10:00:00","date_gmt":"2008-05-14T10:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.msdn.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/2008\/05\/14\/why-always-windows-xp-and-windows-vista-and-not-just-xp-and-vista\/"},"modified":"2008-05-14T10:00:00","modified_gmt":"2008-05-14T10:00:00","slug":"why-always-windows-xp-and-windows-vista-and-not-just-xp-and-vista","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/20080514-00\/?p=22333","title":{"rendered":"Why always &#034;Windows XP&#034; and &#034;Windows Vista&#034; and not just &#034;XP&#034; and &#034;Vista&#034;?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>When the Internet Explorer folks <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.msdn.com\/ie\/archive\/2006\/08\/04\/688899.aspx\"> announced<\/a> that they were going to call their next version of Internet Explorer <i>Internet Explorer&nbsp;7 for Windows&nbsp;XP<\/i> and <i>Internet Explorer&nbsp;7 in Windows&nbsp;Vista<\/i>, many people responded to the awkward name by suggesting that it be shortened to <i>Internet Explorer&nbsp;7 XP<\/i> and <i>Internet Explorer&nbsp;7 Vista<\/i>. Why the longer names?\n Lawyers.\n <a href=\"http:\/\/www.microsoft.com\/about\/legal\/intellectualproperty\/trademarks\/usage\/windows.mspx\"> Microsoft&#8217;s own trademark guidelines<\/a>&dagger; specify that the product names are <i>Windows&nbsp;XP<\/i> and <i>Windows&nbsp;Vista<\/i> and not just <i>XP<\/i> and <i>Vista<\/i>. The trademark is on the entire phrase, not just the last word. Furthermore, the trademark guidelines specify that products may not append just <i>XP<\/i> or <i>Vista<\/i> to their names; they have to say <i>X for Windows&nbsp;XP<\/i> or <i>X for Windows&nbsp;Vista<\/i>.\n In an earlier era, you had to be careful to say <i>Windows&nbsp;NT<\/i> and not just <i>NT<\/i> for the same reason. You see, the name <i>NT<\/i> is a registered trademark of Northern Telecom, and part of the agreement with &#8220;the other NT&#8221; is that the Windows product would always be used with the word <i>Windows<\/i> in front.\n If you took a close look at the Windows&nbsp;2000 box, you may have seen the phrase &#8220;Built on NT Technology.&#8221; I don&#8217;t know how hard it was to do, but I suspect a good amount of negotiations with Northern Telecom took place to allow Microsoft to use that alternate formulation without the word <i>Windows<\/i> in front. Indeed, if you looked really closely at the box, you&#8217;d have found a trademark acknowledgement for Northern Telecom deep in the fine print.\n Lawyers by training are very cautious people. After all, a new lawsuit against Microsoft gets filed approximately once every thirty seconds.&para; They&#8217;re probably also responsible for all your Office# shortcuts on the Start menu being named <i>Microsoft Office This 2007<\/i> and <i>Microsoft Office That 2007<\/i> instead of <i>This 2007<\/i> and <i>That 2007<\/i>, or even (shocking!) just <i>This<\/i> and <i>That<\/i>. It&#8217;s a daring move, and lawyers don&#8217;t like to be daring. Nobody ever got sued for playing it safe.&dagger;&dagger;\n <b>Nitpicker&#8217;s corner<\/b> (guest appearance)\n *Just burning off a footnote marker because I don&#8217;t like asterisks.\n &dagger;I myself violate some of these guidelines because I try to write like a human being and not <a href=\"http:\/\/blogs.msdn.com\/oldnewthing\/archive\/2005\/08\/19\/453614.aspx\"> a robot<\/a>. Only robots say <i>Windows-based programs<\/i>.&Dagger;\n &Dagger;That statement is not literally true. Here&#8217;s a reformulation of that statement for the benefit of robots:&sect; &#8220;People who say <i>Windows-based programs<\/i> sound like robots.&#8221;\n &sect;That statement is also not literally true. Here&#8217;s a reformulation of that statement for the benefit of people who take a robotic approach to reading: &#8220;Here&#8217;s a reformulation of that statement for the benefit of people who take a robotic approach to reading:&#8221;\n ||Burning off another footnote marker because I don&#8217;t like parallel lines either.\n &para;An exaggeration, not a statement of fact.\n #s\/Office\/Microsoft&reg; Office&trade; System\/**\n **I have not researched whether that&#8217;s the correct way of writing it.<\/p>\n<p> &dagger;&dagger;Okay, maybe somebody somewhere has gotten sued for playing it safe. It was just a catchy sentence, not a statement of fact. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When the Internet Explorer folks announced that they were going to call their next version of Internet Explorer Internet Explorer&nbsp;7 for Windows&nbsp;XP and Internet Explorer&nbsp;7 in Windows&nbsp;Vista, many people responded to the awkward name by suggesting that it be shortened to Internet Explorer&nbsp;7 XP and Internet Explorer&nbsp;7 Vista. Why the longer names? Lawyers. Microsoft&#8217;s own [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1069,"featured_media":111744,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[26],"class_list":["post-22333","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-oldnewthing","tag-other"],"acf":[],"blog_post_summary":"<p>When the Internet Explorer folks announced that they were going to call their next version of Internet Explorer Internet Explorer&nbsp;7 for Windows&nbsp;XP and Internet Explorer&nbsp;7 in Windows&nbsp;Vista, many people responded to the awkward name by suggesting that it be shortened to Internet Explorer&nbsp;7 XP and Internet Explorer&nbsp;7 Vista. Why the longer names? Lawyers. Microsoft&#8217;s own [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22333","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1069"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=22333"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/22333\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/111744"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=22333"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=22333"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/oldnewthing\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=22333"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}