{"id":4141,"date":"2011-03-28T09:30:50","date_gmt":"2011-03-28T09:30:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.msdn.microsoft.com\/bharry\/2011\/03\/28\/tfs-integration-platform-updated-mar-11\/"},"modified":"2011-03-28T09:30:50","modified_gmt":"2011-03-28T09:30:50","slug":"tfs-integration-platform-updated-mar-11","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/bharry\/tfs-integration-platform-updated-mar-11\/","title":{"rendered":"TFS Integration Platform Updated (Mar &#8216;11)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, we released a new, tested, binary release of the integration platform (the source has been on CodePlex for a while).&nbsp; This release primarily contains a bunch of bug fixes.&nbsp; The bugs came from our internal use of server to server synchronization tools, customer reports and internal testing.\n<a title=\"http:\/\/visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com\/f854dd59-8eeb-4673-8d9a-ae012989bfa2\" href=\"http:\/\/visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com\/f854dd59-8eeb-4673-8d9a-ae012989bfa2\">http:\/\/visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com\/f854dd59-8eeb-4673-8d9a-ae012989bfa2<\/a>\nThe list of bugs fixes is:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>VC adapter: code review should use cloaked path for pending change comparison<\/li>\n<li>VC adapter: Branch, Merge, Edit code review failure<\/li>\n<li>2 way sync conflict not handled correctly<\/li>\n<li>Created Date greater than Resolved Date for some WIs ported by TFS Migration tool service<\/li>\n<li>VC adapter: Branch, Merge, Edit code review failure<\/li>\n<li>Icons branding shell evoke tools and toolkit<\/li>\n<li>Dev10 Work Item Tests are hard-coded to use ReflectedWorkItemId field<\/li>\n<li>Integration service (SqlChangeGroup) threw OOM exceptions<\/li>\n<li>A directory , which contains an sub directory which is not visible over the Config Spec causes tool to exit with error.<\/li>\n<li>VC adapter: content conflict resolution (take right) is not working when conflict was raised while pipeline flows from right to left<\/li>\n<li>Shell: help link in edit view is not working<\/li>\n<li>TFS 2010 WIT adapter: custom network-topology link gets deleted in bi-directional sync<\/li>\n<li>VC migration does not correctly handle the case of multiple filter paths when one path is a child of another<\/li>\n<li>TFS merges with identical content should appear as changes in CC<\/li>\n<li>Labels added to ClearCase when &#8220;LabelAllVersions&#8221; is true should be logged at Info level<\/li>\n<li>Bi-directional WIT tests: right side filter string generated does not included the work items migrated from the left to right<\/li>\n<li>WIT: Migration \/ sync of work item to work item links does not occur until a field change is made to one of the work items<\/li>\n<li>nightly WIT tests are failing with nullref<\/li>\n<li>WIT migration\/sync: Conflicts of type WITUnmappedWITConflictType and WorkItemTypeNotExistConflictType should not cause the current trip to stop<\/li>\n<li>Some changesets are migrated from TFS to CC more than once<\/li>\n<li>ClearCase (forum post): User unable to configure ClearCase to TFS migration in Shell<\/li>\n<li>ClearCase (forum post): User unable to run ClearCase to TFS migration due to exception parsing date in CC history row<\/li>\n<li>Null Ref exception in Subversion Adapter<\/li>\n<li>Null Ref exception in SubversionShellAdapter<\/li>\n<li>Undelete tests are timing out due to unresolved code review conflicts<\/li>\n<li>FilterPairs with AreaPath values block on ValidationException: TF51011: The node specified is not found in the classification hierarchy<\/li>\n<li>Docs should say that TestCases migration is not supported<\/li>\n<li>Null reference exception occurs in ClearCase adapter when CC ls command output is empty<\/li>\n<li>ClearQuest &#8211; TFS sync: Duplicate bugs are created in TFS<\/li>\n<li>ClearQuest &#8211; TFS sync: Editing a bug in TFS that originated as a CQ Defect causes Runtime Error with COMException on call to ClearQuest API<\/li>\n<li>ClearQuest &#8211; TFS sync: editing State field of a TFS Bug causes ArgumentNullException and stops sync if change would result in invalid CQ state transition<\/li>\n<li>ClearQuest &#8211; TFS sync: adding an attachment to either a CQ Defect or a TFS Bug does not work<\/li>\n<li>ClearQuest adapter fails to detect changes in ClearQuest when timezone is greater than UTC because it uses local time for the HighWaterMark<\/li>\n<li>ClearQuest &#8211; TFS sync: changing the only the State of a ClearQuest Defect does not cause it to be sync&#8217;d until another field is changed<\/li>\n<li>Dogfood: HWM data stored in SYNC_POINT table is wrong causing ServerDiff WIT to ignore many differences (and other problems)<\/li>\n<li>Pioneer Upgrade: Hierarchy links don&rsquo;t sync properly<\/li>\n<li>WIT sync fails for fields of type double with &#8220;decimal point is comma&#8221; setting<\/li>\n<li>ClearQuest &#8211; Migration is blocked by error on query for ClearQuest items to migrate if the CQ database server uses a Date format that is not the ISO standard format<\/li>\n<li>ClearQuest &#8211; ServerDiff Wit command does not work at all when the CQ filter string specifies a CQ stored query (very common)<\/li>\n<li>Key constraint violation occurs on the TFS_IntegrationPlatform DB when resolving a Namespace Conflict<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Together, these represent a significant improvement in stability, correctness and manageability.<\/p>\n<p>Brian<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Last week, we released a new, tested, binary release of the integration platform (the source has been on CodePlex for a while).&nbsp; This release primarily contains a bunch of bug fixes.&nbsp; The bugs came from our internal use of server to server synchronization tools, customer reports and internal testing. http:\/\/visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com\/f854dd59-8eeb-4673-8d9a-ae012989bfa2 The list of bugs fixes [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":244,"featured_media":14617,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[5],"class_list":["post-4141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-tfs"],"acf":[],"blog_post_summary":"<p>Last week, we released a new, tested, binary release of the integration platform (the source has been on CodePlex for a while).&nbsp; This release primarily contains a bunch of bug fixes.&nbsp; The bugs came from our internal use of server to server synchronization tools, customer reports and internal testing. http:\/\/visualstudiogallery.msdn.microsoft.com\/f854dd59-8eeb-4673-8d9a-ae012989bfa2 The list of bugs fixes [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/bharry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/bharry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/bharry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/bharry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/244"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/bharry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4141"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/bharry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4141\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/bharry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/14617"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/bharry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/bharry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/devblogs.microsoft.com\/bharry\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}